论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨传统治疗与改良开塞露治疗在急性心肌梗死患者便秘治疗中的临床效果比较。方法:随机抽取2014年4月至2015年6月该院收治的60例急性心肌梗死患者作为研究对象,随机分为治疗组和对照组各30例,对照组使用传统的灌肠法治疗,治疗组使用改良开塞露治疗,对两组的疗效进行比较。结果:对照组的显效10例,有效17例,无效3例,总有效率为90.43%,治疗组的显效20例,有效9例,无效1例,总有效率为98.65%,通过两组患者的临床效果比较,治疗组的效果明显要比对照组显著(P<0.05)。结论:在急性心肌梗死患者便秘治疗中使用传统治疗与改良开塞露治疗,临床效果都较好,但改良开塞露治疗的效果更为显著,值得临床推广。
Objective: To compare the clinical effects of traditional and modified Kaiserile on patients with constipation in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Methods: A total of 60 patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to our hospital from April 2014 to June 2015 were selected randomly and randomly divided into treatment group (30 cases) and control group (30 cases). The control group was treated with traditional enema method. The treatment group The use of improved Kai Lailu treatment, the efficacy of the two groups were compared. Results: In the control group, 10 cases were markedly effective, 17 cases were effective and 3 cases were ineffective. The total effective rate was 90.43%. In the treatment group, there were 20 cases markedly effective, 9 effective and 1 ineffective. The total effective rate was 98.65% The clinical effect of the treatment group was significantly better than the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion: The treatment of constipation in patients with acute myocardial infarction in the use of traditional and modified Kaiseri Lu treatment, the clinical effect is better, but the improvement Kaiseri Lu treatment effect is more significant and worthy of clinical promotion.