王夫之被誉为古典诗学的光辉总结者,其诗学的基本范畴、命题乃至体系都得到比较全面深刻的研究。近来其诗歌批评也渐受关注,但侧重总结其诗歌批评的整体特征,或者取其诗歌评语以与其诗话相参证,反而很少关注他对诗人、对某一时段诗歌特征等基本诗史问题的判断是否提供了具有启发性的内容。确实,王夫之的几种诗歌选评并非特别精彩,但也需分别对待。用力较深的《古诗评选》中的精彩论断便明显多于《唐诗评选》与《明诗评选》,比如 Wang Fuzhi is regarded as the brilliant summary of classical poetics. The basic categories, propositions and even the system of poetics have been more comprehensive and profound research. Recently, his poetic criticism has drawn more and more attention. However, he has paid close attention to the overall characteristics of his poetic criticism or his poetic commentary in order to prove his poetic evidence. Instead, he paid little attention to his questions about the poet and the basic poetic history of poetry Determine if instructive content is provided. Indeed, Wang Fuzhi’s poetry review is not particularly exciting, but also need to be treated separately. More powerful force of the “ancient poetry selection,” the brilliant statement is significantly more than the “Tang Poetry Selection” and “Ming Poetry Selection”, such as