论文部分内容阅读
使生态批评阐释范围得以普及和拓展的因素,在某些方面似乎也使生态批评免受许多后结构主义思潮的挑战。在环境日趋恶化、危机四伏之情形的推动下,生态批评深受读者广泛而热情的欢迎。它坚决否定蒙昧主义,提倡接触美学,寻求和支持一种即刻性和直接性。这种新学说令人目眩,但在总体上又不是很见成效。~([1])尽管它的内部开始出现越来越多的矛盾,但其批评空间仍具有相当大的开放性。~([2])在此空间[彼得·魁格利(Peter Quigley)称之为“危险空间”]里去建构理论是有一点冒险的,因为它有可能
In some respects, the factors that make the range of ecocriticism interpretation universal also seem to make ecocriticism immune to many poststructuralist ideological challenges. Driven by the deteriorating environment and the crisis, ecocriticism has been widely and enthusiastically welcomed by readers. It resolutely rejects obscurantism, promotes contact with aesthetics, and seeks and supports a kind of immediateness and directness. This new doctrine is dizzying, but generally not very successful. ~ ([1]) Despite the fact that more and more contradictions begin to emerge inside it, its criticism space is still quite open. It is somewhat risky to construct a theory in this space (what Peter Quigley calls “dangerous space”) because it is possible