论文部分内容阅读
本文总结GDM130例,IGT128例,OGTT正常对照120例,比较了OGTT结果,三组之间四项血糖结果差异均有统计学意义,P<0.01,治疗后或复查结果与诊断时OGTT空腹对比差异有统计学意义,P<0.01,GDM与IGT两组糖化血红蛋白结果比较,差异无显著性P>0.20。三组围产儿结局比较GDM与IGT两组巨大儿均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义P<0.025。脐血胰岛素结果与剖宫产率两组也高于对照,差异有显著性P<0.01和P<0.005。说明不仅GDM需要积极处理,IGT组也应进行适当治疗,以改善其结局。
This article summarizes the GDM130 cases, IGT128 cases, OGTT normal control in 120 cases, compared OGTT results, the three groups of four blood glucose differences were statistically significant, P <0.01, after treatment or review results and diagnosis of OGTT fasting contrast There was statistical significance, P <0.01, GDM and IGT two groups of HbA1c compared, the difference was not significant P> 0.20. The three groups of perinatal outcome compared GDM and IGT two groups of giant children were higher than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.025). Umbilical cord blood insulin results and cesarean section rate was also higher than the control two groups, the difference was significant P <0.01 and P <0.005. This shows that not only should GDM be actively managed, but the IGT group should also be appropriately treated to improve its outcome.