迄今为止,学界对“皇族内阁”的研究总体上仍有着“宁贬勿褒”的思维定势,而未能结合其内忧外患的特殊背景及宪政非一蹴而就的事实进行深入的阐述。即便是对该机构有所论述,也只是稍有提及,或语焉不详。一百多年来,学界对其研究的特点主要有:研究起点较晚、论著甚少、内容单调,几乎都只是为研究该内阁的人员构成而作,更为突出的还在于观点大多一致。但实际上,一百多年来被咒骂不止的“皇族内阁”只不过是清廷在考察宪政各国的基础上,结合古今中外之政制及清末内忧外患之国情,从而走移植与嫁接并举的二元君主立宪式道路的产物,是过渡性的责任内阁,是被动荡的时代所催生的早产儿,而并非学界所谓的卖国的、可耻的内阁或谓怪胎。 So far, the study of the “royal cabinet” in the academic field generally still has the tendency of “rather deprecating praise” and fails to combine with the special background of internal and external problems and the fact that constitutional government does not come forth in an instant . Even an account of the agency is only briefly mentioned or absent. For more than one hundred years, the characteristics of its research are mainly as follows: the starting point of the research is late, there are few monographs, monotonous contents, almost all of which are just for the study of the composition of the cabinet staff. What is even more prominent is that most of the opinions are consistent. However, in fact, the “royal cabinet” that has been cursed for more than a century has only been the foundation of the Qing government on the basis of examining various constitutional governments and combining the political systems at home and abroad with those at home and abroad, as well as the internal and external conditions at the end of the Qing Dynasty so as to transplant and graft Concurrently, the product of a dual monarchical constitutional road is a transitional cabinet of responsibility. It is a premature child motivated by the turbulent times. It is not a so-called sectarian or shameful cabinet or freak of academia.