论文部分内容阅读
一、引言青岛会议之后,相继有不少摩尔根学派的专家对米丘林遗传学中的很多问题提出了若干批评,而米丘林学派的专家却一直显得很消沉。因之,使不少人,主要是一些对米丘林学说没有什么根基的青年人和学生感到:米丘林遗传学真是太抽象、概念和哲学化了,研究方法粗枝大叶,阶段发育理论、活质学说、复壮方法、春化处理、无性杂交、春麦变冬麦、获得性遗传、遗传性定义等等,不是有问题,就是弄错了!没有什么学头和搞头了!事实是否如此,希望米丘林学派的专家也能发表一点意见。我们对米丘林遗传学懂得大少、太肤浅。
I. INTRODUCTION After the Qingdao Conference, many experts from the Morgan School successively raised a number of criticisms on many of the problems in Michurin’s genetics, while the experts on the Michurinism have been looking rather depressed. Consequently, many, mainly young people and students, who have no foundation in the theory of Michurin, feel that the genetics of Michurin really are too abstract, conceptual and philosophical, that the methods of research are cumbersome and that the theory of stage development is living There is no problem, that is, mistakes! There is no head and headache! Whether or not this is the case, I hope the experts of the Michurin school can also make some comments. We know a lot about Michurin’s genetics, too superficial.