作为《偃师商城与夏商文化分界》 (简称《分界》)一文的主要执笔者和第一责任人 ,高炜先生对拙作《析〈偃师商城与夏商文化分界〉的研究脉络》(简称《析》)一文提出商榷。笔者欢迎不同学术观点间的讨论和批评。惟《分界》刊登以前 ,未见高炜等先生放弃原来观点的文章发表 ,《分界》行文中又未加任何注释 ,足可见《分界》“研究脉络模糊不清”。关于《分界》所谓的“夏文化”和“商文化”研究已经“不是考古学研究”、《分界》多数作者“是夏商文化同源论者”的评判 ,同样是有事实依据的。笔者认为 :在学术研究中 ,应当提倡实事求是的科学态度 As the main author and the first responsible person of “Yanshi Mall and Xia Shang Cultural Demarcation” (referred to as “demarcation”), Mr. Gao Wei gave his clumsy book on the research context of Yanshi Shang Xia and Xia Shang Culture Demarcation Referred to as “analysis”) a text to be discussed. I welcome the discussion and criticism among different academic views. However, before the publication of “demarcation”, no articles such as Gao Wei et al. Had given up their original opinions were published. There was no comment in the “demarcation” text, which shows that “the demarcation line” and “the research context is vague.” The “demarcation” of the so-called “summer culture” and “business culture” has been “not archaeological research”, “demarcation” most authors “is Xia Shang culture homologists,” the judge is also based on facts. In my opinion, in academic research, we should advocate the scientific attitude of seeking truth from facts