《当代修辞学》2011年第1期刊发朱岱《也说“哥吃的不是面,是寂寞》后,引起许多争议,但大家的兴趣似乎都停留在它该归于哪个辞格上——是拈连、比喻还是比拟,或者兼而有之?却很少有人去关注它究竟是如何形成的。我们认为,有的辞格是解释性的,归入它就对所涉及现象的成因做出了分析,例如将”哥吃的不是面,是寂寞“归入比喻,就一定要用相似性来解释这句话赖以形成的原因,可问题就在于,能够在”面“和”寂寞“之间发现相似性吗?有的辞格仅仅是描写性的,归入它只提供了所 ”Contemporary Rhetoric“ Issue 1, 2011 Issued by Zhu Dai ”It is also said that“ what I eat is not a face, it is loneliness ”has aroused much controversy. However, everyone’s interest seems to be staying in which portrayal it belongs to - However, few are concerned about how exactly it is formed, and we think that some are rhetorical interpretatives, and because of this, they are all about the causes of the phenomena involved The analysis, for example, “the brother is not the face to eat, is lonely,” classified as a metaphor, we must use similarities to explain the reason why this sentence depends on the formation of the problem is that the “face” “And” lonely "find similarities? Some rhetoric is only descriptive, classified as it only provides