论文部分内容阅读
“心即理”之所以被当作心学的标志性命题,就在于它简明直截,从本体论的高度树立了“心”独一无二的地位,将天下之事理归于一心,实现了主体即本体、本体即工夫的融合,从而与程朱天理论从根本上区别开来。除了陆王用这一命题建构思想体系外,“心即理”在佛教和儒家典籍中也曾多次出现,并不都具有心学意义。笼统地将“心即理”作为心学的象征是不准确的。心学有“心即理”的思想,但有“心即理”并不意味着就是心学。
The reason why “Mind is Reason” is regarded as a symbolic proposition of psychology lies in its conciseness and straightforwardness, which sets the unique position of “heart” from the ontology and realizes the cause of the world as one. The main body, namely the ontology and the ontology, is the integration of time and effort, which is fundamentally different from Cheng Zhutian’s theory. Apart from the fact that King Lu used this proposition to construct an ideological system, his “heart is a principle” has appeared many times in Buddhism and Confucian classics and does not all have the psychological meaning. It is inaccurate to generalize the “mind as principle” as the symbol of psychology. Psychology has “mind that is rationale ” thinking, but “mind is rationale ” does not mean that is psychology.