论文部分内容阅读
司法解释能有效地解决抽象的法律条文与实际的现实纠纷之间的接合问题,其具有保证法律正确实施、实现秩序公正的工具价值,司法解释的制定和适用本身也具有了一定的独立价值。经过多年来的发展和完善,司法解释在弥补立法不足,明确法律调整的范围,维护法律适用的统一性等多方面都充分地发挥了作用。然而,随着国家立法步伐的加快,应用的广泛化和常态化,作为具有法律效力的司法解释在内容与涉及范围上日益扩大,出现了越权和冲突的局面,从而引发了人们关于司法解释的相关思索。
Judicial interpretation can effectively solve the problem of the connection between the abstract legal provisions and the actual disputes. It has the value of tools to ensure the correct implementation of the law and the realization of order justice. The formulation and application of judicial interpretation itself also has certain independent value. After years of development and improvement, judicial interpretation has played its full role in many aspects such as making up for the lack of legislation, clarifying the scope of legal adjustment, and safeguarding the uniformity of the application of law. However, with the acceleration of the pace of national legislation, the extensive and normalized application, as a legally binding judicial interpretation, has been expanded in content and scope, resulting in the situation of overreaching and conflicts. As a result, people’s opinions on judicial interpretation Related thinking.