一 1982年我在《历史研究》上发表了一篇题为《火佃新探》的文章,引起了史学界的不少反响。一时唱和者纷起,而持固见者亦有微辞,虽非轩然大波,却也荡起了一些微澜。早想再作论证,不料被集体任务延误了。我接触徽州文书档案很早。五十年代当徽州文书大量被购进历史所之后,虽尘封山集,还是抽空去漫无目的的浏览了。“文革”后百废待兴,我和几个同事主持整理历史所收藏的徽州文书档案,在较为系统地阅读了徽档之后发现,在徽州租佃关系的研究中,存在不少值得商榷之处。 In 1982, I published an article titled “A New Probe into the Fire Department” in “Historical Studies”, which aroused much reaction from historians. A moment to sing and those who are up, but also those who hold the testimony of micro-speech, though not uproar, but also some damp rattled up. I would like to make an argument as early as possible, but I was afraid that it was delayed by the collective task. I contacted the Huizhou file very early. In the 1950s, when a large number of Huizhou instruments were bought into the history, though they were clouded by dust, they went to timeless browsing. “Cultural Revolution ” after all the time to be over, I and several colleagues presided over the collection of the history of the collection of Huizhou instruments files, a more systematic reading of the emblem found that there is much worth in the study of the tenancy relationship in Huizhou Discuss the place.