粗暴的批评受到了批评以后,曾经消沉了一个时期;最近在“百花齐放,百家争鸣”的口号下又有鱼目混珠、卷土重来之势。问题还不在于有的刊物又发表了粗暴的批评,更在于这样的批评没有遭到公开的反对,反倒有种种理由为之辩护。“百家争鸣”的口号并不能给粗暴批评以可乘之机,陆定一同志在他题为“百花齐放,百家争鸣”的报告中讲得很明白。他说:批评应该分清敌我, Once the crude criticism was criticized, it has been in a period of depression for a period. Recently, under the slogan of “letting a hundred flowers bloom and a hundred schools of thought contend,” there are also numerous relics. The problem is not that some journals have published brutal criticisms, but also that such criticisms have not been openly opposed and instead there are various reasons for defending them. The slogan of “contending for a hundred schools of thought” does not give any opportunity for crude criticism. Comrade Lu Dingyi made it very clear in his report entitled “Hundred Flowers Are Blooming and All Schools Contend”. He said: Criticism should distinguish between ourselves and ourselves,