论文部分内容阅读
《公司法》第16条本质上是公司内部的决策形成机制或者公司意思形成机制,规范的是公司内部的行为,根据《合同法》第52条第1-4条的规定,导致合同无效的一般是公司外部行为,而内部决议一般不直接导致无效,所以如果经过股东会或者股东大会决议,公司是可以对外担保的,而且,违反上述规定对外提供担保,也不会直接导致公司对外担保合同无效。而根据《合同法》第50条的规定,在代表行为越权的例外情况下,如果相对人知道或者应当知道越权而仍与之签订合同,表明相对人主观上有恶意,而非为善意相对人,因而法律不予保护,而判断相对人是否为善意,则应当规定相对人对公司章程的形式审查义务。
Article 16 of the Corporations Act is essentially a decision-making mechanism or a formation mechanism of the company’s internal rules governing the internal acts of the company. According to the provisions of Article 1-4 of Article 52 of the Contract Law, the contract is invalid Generally external behavior of the company, and the internal resolution generally does not directly lead to invalid, so if through the shareholders ’meeting or shareholders’ meeting resolution, the company can be guaranteed, and in violation of the above provisions to provide security, it will not directly lead to the company external guarantee contract invalid. According to Article 50 of the Contract Law, if the relative knows or ought to know that over-tenure and still signs a contract with the exception of the representative’s over-power, it indicates that the counterpart is subjectively malicious rather than a goodwill relative , So the law does not protect, but to determine whether the relative is goodwill, it should be the relative provisions of the Articles of Association review obligations.