论文部分内容阅读
12月初,广州传来消息:’95中国艺术博览会(广州展区)开幕第三天,当地某报发表了一篇为《众口纷纭说艺博》的报道,记者称:偶尔邂逅的一位画家和一位收藏家说:“今年总体感觉不如去年,品位低,值得买的几乎没有。来的画廊不多,画商更少,参展一半是本地画界新丁”、“与第一届博览会相比距离太远,只有几张是真的,其他是临摹,假的。”这篇报道一下给这次艺博会定了位,使参观人数明显减少,来洽谈的画商望而却步。被损害和干扰的百余名画家愤而罢展,并提交诉状,要求赔偿。 一篇不足800字的失实报道,使’95广州艺博会骤起波澜,造成中国书画界罕见的集体抗议和停展事件,此事虽然以某报的公开道歉和重作
In early December, a message came from Guangzhou: On the third day of the opening of the 95th China Art Fair (Guangzhou Exhibition Zone), a local newspaper published an article titled “Various Opinions,” the reporter said: An artist who occasionally met And a collector said: “This year the overall feeling is not as good as last year, the grade is low, it is worth to buy almost none. To the gallery is small, fewer exhibitors, exhibitors half is the local painting industry new Ding”, “and the first phase of the Expo Too far from the distance, only a few are true, the other is copy, fake. ”This article about the art fair set to make a significant reduction in the number of visitors to negotiate the painter. Hundreds of painters who were damaged and interfered with each other went out of their fury and submitted pleadings seeking compensation. A misrepresentation of less than 800 words caused the surge in ’95 Guangzhou Art Fair, resulting in a rare collective protest and halting incident in the Chinese calligraphy and painting industry. Although this incident was based on a public apology and reworking of a newspaper