宋南渡之后的早年,我杂览时碰到有争论的两件事:一件是李清照改嫁的真伪,另一件是和战的是非。争论的场面不同:前一件有势均力敌之势,后一件则几乎是一边倒,说战是而和非,只有吕思勉先生在民国早年唱过一次反调。就理说,历史事件的真相,只要证据充足而且明确,没有什么可争论的,所谓凭证据说话是也。可是情况常 In the early years after Song Nandu, I encountered two controversial issues in the magazine: one was the authenticity of Li Qingzhao’s remarriage, and the other was the war against the wrong. The controversial scenes are different: the former is evenly matched and the latter is almost one-sided. It is only the war between right and wrong that only Lu Si Mian sang an anti-tune in early Republican China. Logically speaking, the truth of historical events, as long as the evidence is sufficient and clear, there is no argument, the so-called evidence is true. But the situation often