论文部分内容阅读
南书房制度递嬗、人员变迁及日常运行情况于清史研究至关重要,而相关研究所能依据的文献极为鲜见。查慎行《陪猎笔记》、《南斋日记》不仅对查慎行研究是极可珍视的第一手资料,对南斋制度研究也极其重要。《历史档案》2014年第2期发表了对《南斋日记》稿本的介绍文章,于相关研究有所助益。但由于稿本文字漫漶、行草率意,使相关介绍存有缺憾:一是将日记稿本写作时间由康熙四十三年误成康熙四十六年,以致所论史事与史实南辕北辙;二是将张廷玉的始入直时间误成查昇的,并颠倒了查慎行、查昇的叔侄关系。为免误导,特加考证。
The evolution of South study system, personnel changes and daily operation are of crucial importance in the study of Qing history, and the literature on which the relevant research can be based is extremely rare. Charles Shen line “hunting notes”, “Diaries Suddenly” not only for Charles Shen line research is extremely valuable first-hand information on the study of the system of the South vegetarian is also extremely important. In the second issue of “Historical Archives” in 2014, the article introducing the manuscripts of Nazari diary was helpful in the research. However, due to the manuscripts dramas, the idea of making the introduction of the relevant shortcomings: First, the diary manuscript writing time from forty-three years of Kangxi into Kangxi forty-six years, so that the discussion of historical events and the actual situation ;; Zhang Tingyu is the beginning of the straight into the wrong time into investigation, and reversed Charles Shen line, check up the relationship between the nephew and the nephew. In order to avoid misleading, extra-textual research.