论文部分内容阅读
2002年元旦杭州《都市快报》新闻竞赛栏目中推出《价值数千万的别墅炸了更划算》一文。该文作了因别墅没有市场而炸掉后改建高档公寓的相关报道。出乎我的意料,该文作者和编者都对炸楼一事津津乐道,并且还给出了不少经济学分析。该文“编者附言”称:房产商不是傻子,炸了价值数千万元的别墅重新建小区,是一种十分理性的经济行为。“那么谁是傻子?掰着指头来数与房地产开发的相关人——政府、企业和个人,则傻子只能落到政府和消费者头上了。因为,该文计算的开发商收益可能正要落在他们头上:一方面,或许国有资产正是这样流失的,即基础设施投入、开发强度(容积率和建筑密度)提高等所产生的土地增值转入了开发商的腰包;另方面,开发商付出的双倍建安成本及其利息等费用,最终还是要转嫁到消费者身上的。这几年,杭州的房价一直在涨(业內
New Year’s Day in Hangzhou, ”Metro Express,“ News Race column launched ”worth tens of millions of villas exploded even more cost-effective“ article. The article made a report because of the villa without the market after the bombing of high-grade apartments renovation. To my surprise, both the author and editor of the article relished the story of bombing and gave quite a lot of economic analysis. The article ”Editor’s Note “ said: the real estate business is not a fool, exploding tens of millions of villas to rebuild the district, is a very rational economic behavior. ”So who is a fool? Breaking his fingers to the number and real estate development related - government, business and personal, then fools can only fall to the government and consumers .Because, the article calculates the developer may benefit On the one hand, perhaps it is such a loss of state-owned assets that the added value of land generated by infrastructure investment and development intensity (floor area ratio and building density) is transferred to the pockets of developers; and on the other hand, In the area, developers pay twice the cost of construction and interest costs and other costs, eventually passed on to consumers who in recent years, Hangzhou house prices have been rising (industry