论文部分内容阅读
结构主义思路在理论建构和政策结论上的主要缺陷可归结为如下三个方面: 1.理论框架过于松散。同新古典思路相比,结构思路更接近现实,但远不如新古典思路那样严密。结构思路的各主要假定前提以描述性陈述为特征,远未达到公理化程度。结构主义者所使用的分析工具,其初衷显然是想建构能将社会、政治、文化等多方面非经济参数包纳进来的理论模型,由于变量太多,致使经济分析的理论框架显得过于松散。
The main defects of the structuralist train of thought in theoretical construction and policy conclusion can be summarized as follows: 1. The theoretical framework is too loose. Compared with the new classical thinking, the structural thinking is more realistic, but far less strict than the neoclassical thinking. The main assumptions of the structural ideas are characterized by descriptive statements that are far from being axiomatic. The original purpose of structural analysis tools used by structuralists is obviously to construct a theoretical model that incorporates various non-economic parameters such as social, political and cultural aspects. Due to the large number of variables, the theoretical framework of economic analysis appears to be too loose.