论文部分内容阅读
中国女排奥运夺冠,国人振奋,但也有别样说法,有说是“郎平个人的胜利”的,有说“靠实力而不是靠精神”的,当然,也不会缺少“不把奥运当成国家荣誉的竞技场”、“不把胜负与为国争光紧密相连”的声音。出现这些声音,不令人意外,各说各话,社会丰富性使然,也算是言论宽度的部分证明吧。但这并不意味着我们就得同意那些“特立独行”的意见。我们当然要为运动员、教练员个人的成就而高兴,但并不认为奥运就不是国家荣誉的竞技场,奥运会
Chinese women’s volleyball team won the Olympic Games, people excited, but there are different ways of saying there is “Lang Ping personal victory”, there are “strength rather than by the spirit of”, of course, will not lack “ The Olympic Games as a national arena of honor ”,“ not to win the outcome and the glory of the country closely linked to ”voice. The appearance of these voices is not surprising. Each of these words and the richness of society make part of the proof of speech width. But that does not mean that we have to agree with those “maverick” opinions. Of course, we are happy for the personal achievements of the athletes and coaches. However, we do not think that the Olympic Games are not the arena for honor of the state. The Olympic Games