凯歌大师:今天专门就您起诉《一个馒头引发的血案》作者胡戈一事给您写信,只想表达一个意思:希望您重新考虑打官司一事。我想,打官司只是一种手段。如果打赢胡戈这一官司,能消除《馒头血案》给您带来的精神刺激;降低其在社会上的“负面”影响;警告小朋友对您的花花草草进行破坏的企图,从而拨乱反正,重建您作为一个电影大师的高大形象,那么我觉得您不妨一告。但在我看来,您的起诉不但不能够达到以上目的,相反还可能造成南辕北辙的效果,所以请您不妨听听我的劝说。首先,我们做一个假设。假设您能赢。但我要说:赢又如何?告倒一个胡戈,江湖立马就风平浪静了吗?小孩夜啼听见“陈凯歌”就噤若 Kaixi Guru: Today, I wrote a letter to you just about suing you for suing Huge, the author of “A Bread-induced Blood Case.” I only want to express one meaning: I hope you will reconsider your case. I think litigation is only a means. If you win the lawsuit of Hugo, you can eliminate the mental stimulation brought about by the “bloody case of steamed bun”, reduce its “negative” impact on the society, and warn the children of their attempt to destroy your plants and flowers so as to rectify any disruption , Rebuild your tall image as a movie master, then I think you might as well. However, in my opinion, not only can your prosecution fail to achieve the above objective, but on the contrary, it may also result in diametrically opposed effects. Therefore, please listen to my persuasion. First, let's make a hypothesis. Suppose you can win. But I want to say: How to Win? Reported a Hugo, rivers and lakes immediately calm it? The child heard the night crying “Chen Kaige”