论文部分内容阅读
我们可以由普列汉诺夫执守的“像物理学那么客观”的唯物主义文艺思想,由他对斯宾诺莎那句名言——“对于这个世界,不哭,也不笑,而是理解”的推崇,敏感到其中确实存在着受动论、数学方法论的局限。就此意义而言,正如尼采向斯宾诺莎“无动于衷”命题之挑战,鲁迅以其重主观的文艺思想对普列汉诺夫式的决定论理念连同它那不哭、不笑的姿态进行反拨,自有其一定的合理性;但这并不意味着可以无视鲁迅、卢那察尔斯基的主观能动倾向与“拉普”式的阶级意志表现说、能动论的局部契合,更不意味着可以忘忽普氏的客观主义对卢氏的“阶级的主观主义”的必要抑制作用。须知任何形式的非此即彼、扬此抑彼,只会导致历史发展的失衡。
We can be obeyed by Plekhanov’s “materialistic literature and art as objective”, by his famous quote on Spinoza - “for this world, do not cry nor smile , But to understand the ”respected “, sensitive to the existence of the existence of the theory of motion, mathematical methodological limitations. In this sense, just as Nietzsche challenged Spinoza’s ”indifference“ proposition, Lu Xun’s Pleu-Hanovian determinism, with its emphasis on important literary ideas, together with its not crying, no-laughter attitude However, this does not mean that we can disregard the subjective and proactive tendency of Lu Xun and Lunacharsky and the performance of the ”Laput“ class will say that the part of dynamic theory Nor does it mean that one can forget Platon’s objectivism’s necessary inhibitory effect on Rousseau’s ”class subjectivism." It is important to note that any form of non-compliance, promotion and suppression will only lead to an imbalance in historical development.