郝时远先生对中国民族学学科建设发展史的梳理;关于对当代中国特色民族学对象、理论、分支设置以及内涵的阐释与思考一文,从上期至本期作为特约稿刊出。此乃编辑部如同在总90期对杨圣敏先生大作:《历史上维吾尔族与突厥及土耳其的关系》刊发之用心皆出一辙,诉求予“认知”的知其然,却不明其“所以然”的那类形似“老”而“旧”问题的再钩沉。其实,都是我们依据日常教、研之切身体会,期望开展一些虽属基础性、但确系至今仍被众所 Mr. Hao Shiyuan combs the history of the development of Chinese ethnology; the article on interpretation and reflection on the ethnological objects, theories, branches and connotation of contemporary Chinese characteristics is published as a special draft from the previous issue to the present issue. This is exactly what the editorial department has done in writing about Mr. Yang Shengmin in the 90th period: “The historical relationship between the Uighurs and the Turks and Turkey” is exactly the same. Its “so” kind of shape “old ” and “old ” problem again. In fact, we are all based on daily teaching, research and personal experience, expecting to carry out some of the basic, but it is still the Department of all