论文部分内容阅读
共创和谐社会平安养老保险最近传得沸沸扬扬的延长退休年龄之争,在经济低迷的经济背景下,显得尤为热烈。这场争论的本质是我国养老保险制度的二元化导致的利益分配不公所致。在企业层面,单位职工要缴纳养老保险等各种费用,推行强制性养老保险制度,遵循权利与义务对等原则。职工每月缴纳的各种社会保障费用(包括住房公积金)几乎相当于应发工资的30%左右,这是一笔沉重的负担。同时,企业也要为职工缴纳社会保障金,个人和企业均感负担
To create a harmonious society Safe old-age insurance recently passed uproar to extend the retirement age dispute in the economic downturn in the economic context, it is particularly warm. The nature of this debate is caused by the unequal distribution of benefits caused by the dualization of China’s pension insurance system. At the enterprise level, employees of the units must pay various expenses such as old-age insurance, introduce a compulsory pension insurance system, and follow the principle of equal rights and obligations. The various social security contributions (including housing provident fund) paid by workers each month amount to almost 30% of the wages payable, which is a heavy burden. At the same time, enterprises also pay social security benefits for their employees, both for individuals and businesses