申遗是为了保护文物,但为什么现在却为了申遗,反而要破坏文物?到目前为止,这一事件的民间回应完全一边倒——人们悲愤质问:“偌大的中国,难道就没有玄奘的一个安身之处吗?”为申遗而拆迁千年古寺,这一做法引起公众强烈质疑。面对质疑,西安市长安区民族宗教事务局4月11日回应称,拟拆迁的都是新建建筑,不算是文物。但这一解释并未得到兴教寺的认可。4月11日下 The inscription is to protect the cultural relics, but why it is now for the inscription, but to destroy the cultural relics? So far, the civil response to this incident completely one-sided - people sadly question: “big China, is there no Xuanzang A place to shelter it? ”" To apply for the demolition of the Millennium Temple, a practice aroused strong public doubts. In the face of doubt, Chang’an District Bureau of Religious Affairs of the People’s Republic of China responded on April 11 that the buildings to be demolished are all newly-built buildings and are not regarded as cultural relics. However, this interpretation has not been approved by Xingjiao Temple. April 11th