论文部分内容阅读
我们媒体的报道常常犯因果思维定势的毛病,只注重起因和结果,而整个事件过程中的复杂多样却很少提及,往往给读者“一……,就……”的错误引导。比如去年中国信达公司对冶钢集团6.3亿元建行贷款实行债转股,媒体纷纷对此事做了报道。其中,一家都市报记者写道:“……此次债转股可使企业资产负债率下降11个百分点,一年减少4000多万元的利息负担,当年实现扭亏为盈。”中央把“债转股”作为国企三年解困的战略举措之一,但仅凭“债转股”一举,冶
The reports of our media often make the causal thinking of the problems. They only focus on causes and consequences. However, the complicated and diverse aspects of the entire incident are seldom mentioned. They often lead the readers to “one ......, ... ...” wrong guidance. Last year, for example, China’s Cinda Company implemented a debt-to-equity swap of CCB loans of 630 million yuan to the Metallurgical Group, and the media made reports on the issue. Among them, a Metropolis Daily reporter wrote: “... ... this debt-to-equity shift will enable enterprises to reduce the asset-liability ratio by 11 percentage points a year to reduce the interest burden on more than 4000 million, then turn losses into profit.” The central “debt Equity Swap ”as one of the strategic measures to relieve the state-owned enterprises in three years, but only“ debt to equity ”in one fell swoop,