论文部分内容阅读
用“六家”、“九流十家”中的某一个学派名称来定位新出土简帛文献中的篇章,是学界常用的方法。但这种做法也导致众说纷纭,莫衷一是,而“百家争鸣”之“百家”则湮没无闻。其实能否用“六家”、“九流十家”描述早期中国的学术派别,是存在争议的,因此早期中国学派划分的根据至今不明。经过考察早期中国、古代希腊、佛教、基督教、伊斯兰教、道教、近现代西方哲学等有关派别的划分,可以发现从东西方通约的视角看,师承和宗旨是最常使用的称呼学术派别的方法,但是从师承的角度更利于划分学派并分析有关问题。
It is a commonly used method in the academic circles to locate the chapter in the newly unearthed silk and silk literature with the name of one of the six schools and the nine schools of ten. However, this approach has also led to divergent opinions and mixed feelings, while the “one hundred schools of thought” “hundred” is annihilated. In fact, it is still controversial to describe the academic factions in early China with “Six ” and “Nine out of ten ”. Therefore, the basis for the early Chinese school division is still unknown. After examining the division of the relevant factions in early China, ancient Greece, Buddhism, Christianity, Islam, Taoism and modern Western philosophy, we can find that the most commonly used scholarly school Methods, but from the perspective of teachers is more conducive to the division of schools and analyze the issues.