(前不久的一次小学部一年级统测试题中的一道判断正误题。)“喜鹊是一种常见的鸟。”“错。”“为什么?”“我们这里没有啊!”“同意!”她甜甜地笑了,活蹦乱跳的离我而去,那羊角小辫逐渐地消失了。但是,似乎唯一我是她的知音,因为其他老师有“答案”作支撑。当时,我可能是自以为是、理性的偏激吧!始终支持她的观点,并且心里默念着“她是实事求是者,理论联系实际者……”的确,在我们这里20多年前,喜鹊是一种常见的鸟。它还时不 (Not long ago, a primary school in the first year of test questions in a judgment is correct.) “Magpie is a common bird. ” “Wrong. ” “Why? ” “We do not have ah ! ”“ Agree! ”She laughed sweetly, jumping away from me, that croissant gradually disappeared. However, the only thing that seems to me is her compliment, as other teachers are supported by “answer ”. At that time, I may be self-righteous, rational extreme! Always support her point of view, and the silent meditation “She is a matter of fact, theory with reality ... ...” Indeed, in our 20 years ago, the magpie is a Common bird. It does not yet