本刊95/10期登载了拙文《寻回迷失的燕台》,原有一则“补记”,因邮寄失误致未赶及同时发表,今再重述于此。我们考证的主要依据是《长安客话》与《日下旧闻考》,却忘了提到《宸垣识略》。这《识略》记叙黄金台时.却说是在“永定门外”。这就不对了.因为《客话》明白无误地说是出东便门,循濠至“东南角”,金台遗迹在此(只剩一个大“土阜”了),这儿一个“东便门”通连着“东南角”,地理方位是十分清楚合理的;而若系“永定门外”,那就无法与京城的“东南角”合符对榫。由于《客话》是明代的地方官之所著,应该叙次措词不会太随便;而《识略》只是 This issue 95/10 issue of my article “recovered lost Yantai”, the original one “Supplement”, due to missed mail due to delay at the same time published, repeat here. The main basis for our research is “Chang’an Hakka” and “under the old news test”, but forgot to mention “Chen Yuan knowledge strategy.” This “Slightly” narrates the golden stage when it is said to be “outside Yongding.” This is wrong, because “Hakka” is plainly known as Dongbian Gate and Xuanhao to the “southeast corner” where the remains of Jintai are located (there is only one large “Tufu”), and here a “Dongbianmen” Through the “southeastern corner”, the geographical position is very clear and reasonable; and if “Yongdingmen”, it can not be the capital of the “southeast corner” in line with the tenon. Since “Hakka” is a local official in the Ming Dynasty, narrative words should not be too arbitrary; whereas “consummation” is only