论文部分内容阅读
河北北京师范学院历史系三年级师生集体编写的《中华人民共和国史稿》出版以来,有相当的影响。我们想谈谈自己的一些看法,以供读者讨论。我们相信,在短短二十天内完成近三十万字的中华人民共和国历史的编写工作,是发挥了干劲、书夜苦战的结果。但是,就《史稿》的内容来说,是不能令人满意的。首先,在编写工作上,存在以下两个根本的缺点。第一,是抄述、拼揍和材料堆砌。编写历史,要以党的文件、领袖著作为依据,也有必要参考其他同志的各种专著;但决不能简单地抄述、拼凑或进行材料的堆砌。这就需要独立思考,需要研究、分析、概括,然后对问题进行确当的论述。可是,《史稿》没有做到这一点。书中抄述的地方很多,如“论人民民主专政”一节,大体上是照出版的革命史讲义抄的;过渡时期总路线和
Since the publication of the “History of the People’s Republic of China” by the third-year teachers and students in the Department of History of Beijing Normal University in Hebei Province, it has had a considerable impact. We would like to talk about some of our own ideas for discussion. We believe that the compilation of the history of the People’s Republic of China, with the completion of nearly 300,000 words in just 20 days, is the result of a hard-working, midnight struggle. However, the content of “history draft” is unsatisfactory. First of all, there are two fundamental weaknesses in the preparation of the work. The first is copying, fight and stuffing. It is also necessary to refer to the various monographs of other comrades on the basis of the party’s documents and leaders’ writings in the preparation of the history. However, we must never simply copy, piece together or assemble the materials. This requires independent thinking, research, analysis, generalization, and then make a proper exposition of the problem. However, “history draft” did not do this. There are many places in the book, such as the section on “People’s Democratic Dictatorship,” which is basically copied according to the published handouts of revolutionary history; the general line during the transitional period