论文部分内容阅读
本刊讯“在对科技期刊的质量评判中,人们往往是以问卷的方式征求一部分专家或读者对某一期刊的评估,以之来确定刊物的质量高低.这虽然是检验科技期刊质量优劣的一种方法,但是,由于各人对评定标准掌握分寸不一,专业爱好各异,因而或多或少地带有人为的因素,很难对刊物质量作出较为科学的评定.”这是《广西气象》杂志编辑部李耀先,梁春泰和李秀存等在中国科学技术期刊编学会(无锡)第二次学术年会上宣读的《Fuzzy 综合评判用于<广西气象>质量分析》一文中提出的见解.本文在对
In our evaluation of the quality of sci-tech periodicals, people usually ask some experts or readers to assess the periodicals by means of questionnaires, so as to determine the quality of sci-tech periodicals. But it is difficult to make a more scientific assessment of the quality of the publications because each person has different degrees of professionalism and different professional interests due to different masters of the assessment criteria. “This is The article ”Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation for Quality Analysis of Guangxi Meteorology>" read by Li Yaoxian, Liang Chuntai, and Li Xiucun, editors of Guangxi Meteorological Society at the Second Academic Annual Meeting of China Society of Science and Technology Journals (Wuxi) This article is right