公孙龙,战国时赵国人也。他的《名实论》不象“离坚白”和“白马非马”那样深奥难懂,至今读起来仍琅琅于齿颊间。且不说应该怎样公正地评价这位古代哲学家,但他“以正名实而化天下”的思想,却有着不可回避的现实意义！ 马克思主义者,首先要从世界观和方法论入手学习马克思主义,这大概是没有异议的。那么,对于名实之分,也应该有一个正确的态度。 据说,有些单位至今确定生产建设指标,尤其是计划外的基建指标,还是想当然,摆脱不了“浪漫色彩”,盲目偏高。有些单位计算城乡人均收入水平,不求务实,执意偏高。名为实之宾。脱离了“实”,徒务那些虚名干什么?玩弄这种数字游戏,于国何益?于民何补?这种自欺 Kung-sun Dragon, the Warring States Period, Zhao also. His “real-name theory” is not so profound as “hard-nosed” and “non-white horse,” so far it still reads in the teeth and cheeks. Not to say how to appraise this ancient philosopher justly, but his thought of “realizing the world with his name” has its unavoidable realistic significance! Marxists, first and foremost, must learn Marxism from the perspective of the world and methodology. This is probably not the case. Well, there should be a correct attitude toward the distinction between real name and reality. It is said that some units so far set production and construction targets, especially unstructural infrastructure indicators, or taken for granted, can not escape the “romantic” blind high. Some units calculate the per capita income level of urban and rural areas, without seeking pragmatism and high willpower. Named the real object. Out of the “real”, what is the service of those imaginary? Playing this digital game, in the country what benefits?