在五十年代,我们学习马列主义的劲头都很足。斯大林的著作,大概是离我们近一些,更是比较容易读得进,印象深刻。一直到现在,也仍然记得他的一些具体论点。例如,他曾经批评过把马克思主义当作教条的不良倾向,我现在仍能很快就从书中找出来。他在一处地方说:“如果要求马克思主义创始人给我们规定出可能在五十年至一百年以后,在每一个别国家里发生的所有一切理论问题的现成答案,使我们——马克思主义创始人底后代子孙——可以安然躺在火炕上来咀嚼现成答案,那就可笑之至了。”他还讲了一个实在可笑之至的关于革命党人的故事:当克里米发生海陆军反对沙皇的暴动时,海军与步兵代表要求社会民主党人领导他们的革命行动,在门外等候指示。而社会民主党人呢?他们“拿了《资本论》第一卷,拿第二卷,结果《资本论》第三卷也拿来了……关子斯瓦土 In the fifties, we were full of strength in studying Marxism-Leninism. Stalin’s writings, probably closer to us, is more readable and impressive. Until now, he still remembered some of his specific arguments. For example, he once criticized the undesirable tendencies of using Marxism as dogma, and I can still quickly find out from the book. He said in one place: ”If the Marxist founders were asked to prescribe a ready-made answer to all the theoretical problems that might have occurred in every other country 50 or 100 years later, It is laughable that the next generation of Marxist founders, who can safely lay their hands on the kang, can answer the question of ready-made answers. “He also told a truly ridiculous story about the revolutionaries: when Kerimi happened When the navy and the army opposed the Tsarist insurrection, naval and infantry representatives demanded that the Social-Democrats lead their revolutionary actions and wait outside the door for instructions. And what about social democrats? ”They took the first volume of Capital and took the second volume, and the third volume of Capital was also brought in.