一、争论是围绕着两个命题展开的关于抽象劳动是永恒的还是历史的范畴,政治经济学界在这个问题上一直存在着激烈的争论。目时我们使用的政治经济学教科书对抽象劳动的解释反映两种截然对立的观点。一种观点认为,抽象劳动是历史的范畴,例如,于光远、苏里主编的《政治经济学》资本主义部分上册指出:“抽象劳动是商品生产特有的范畴,不是永恒的范畴。”持这种观点的同志的主要论据是,只有在商品生产者把劳动产品作为商品去生产的条件下,才发生不同使用价 First, the debate revolves around two propositions about whether abstract labor is an eternal or historical category, and there has been a heated debate among political economists on this issue. At the moment, the interpretation of abstract labor in our textbook of political economy reflects two diametrically opposed views. One view is that abstract labor is a category of history. For example, Yu Guangyuan and Suri, editor of the Political Economy Capitalism section, pointed out: “Abstract labor is a category that is peculiar to commodity production and not an eternal category.” The main argument of comrades in this view is that different prices for use occur only when the producer of the goods manufactures the product as a commodity