论文部分内容阅读
学者间对(弋卩)其卣三器之真伪问题每多聚讼。李棪斋先生《晚殷(弋卩)其卣三器考释》一文论之最详。而于三器之定名,李学勤及孙稚雏两先生均注意及六祀(弋卩)其卣之作器者为作册“”,故以为宜改称“隻子卣”,所论至为恰当。然一般学者已习惯(弋卩)其三卣之称谓。今后对三器之称名,不妨自我调整。 二祀及四祀(弋卩)其卣两器,除盖、器有“亚獏,父丁”对铭外,二祀卣外底另有铭文37字。四祀卣外底则有铭42字。铭文出现在器外底虽非绝无仅有,然确属鲜见。且两器亦经修补,故引起不少有关三器真伪之讨论。
Scholars of the (Yi Jie) three of its authenticity of the issue of each multi-litigation. Mr. Li Zhai vegetarian “late Yin (Yi Jie) three test” a theory of the most detailed. And in the three device’s name, Li Xueqin and Sun Ziqin two gentlemen are concerned about and six worship (Yi Jie) their 卣 the author for the book “”, so it should be renamed “only child 卣”, the argument is appropriate. However, in general, scholars have been accustomed to (Yi Jie) the title of the three 卣. In the future the name of the three devices, may wish to self-adjustment. Two sacrifices and four sacrifices (Yi Jie) Two of its devices, except for cover, there are “Asian 貘, father Ding,” Ming Ming, two 卣 卣 out inscription 37 words. Four 卣 卣 outsole there Ming 42 words. Inscription appears in the outsole though not unique, of course, is rare. And the two devices have also been repaired, it caused a lot of discussion about the authenticity of three devices.