《电影评介》一九八二年第三期刊登了一篇《看<模范丈夫>有感》的文章,读后,觉得文章有些提法不够实事求是。文章说:电影《模范丈夫》通过艺术的典型描写,风趣地回答了夫妻关系应如何处理这个现实生活中带有普遍性的社会问题。果真是这样吗?否!恰恰相反,影片并没有把这个问题回答清楚,或者说它回答得并不准确!也许文章作者要说,影片不是已经通过模范丈夫“余怕怕”的“模范行动”作了回答吗?然而,试问:那是什么样的回答呢?难道需要广大的电影观众,乃至所有的丈夫们都象影片男主人公“余怕怕”那样从早到晚“额头上淌着汗珠,眼角上带着微笑,自动地兼任家庭‘不管部长’,妻子、儿女不管的家务事全归他管”吗?象“余怕怕”那样无原则地娇惯自己的妻子儿女有什么必要吗?更有何值得夸奖的呢?家庭是 “Film Review” published in the third issue of 1982, an article entitled “Look at Feelings,” after reading, I feel some articles in the article are not realistic enough. The article said: The film “model husband” through the typical description of art, humorous answer to the relationship between husband and wife should be how to deal with this real life with universal social issues. On the contrary, the film does not answer this question clearly, or it does not answer accurately! Perhaps the author of the article should say that the film is not a “model action” that has been “scared” by a model husband, Did you reply? However, ask: What kind of answer? Is it necessary for the majority of moviegoers, and even all of the husbands to sweat their foreheads like the heroine “I’m scared” Beads, with a smile on his eyes, automatically serving as a family, “regardless of minister,” wife, children regardless of the housework all go under his control? “Like” I’m afraid "is not necessary to perplexed his wife and children, What more worthy of praise? Family is