论文部分内容阅读
竞技体育行为在正当化事由体系中应定位为正当业务和被害人承诺这两种正当化事由的竞合;竞技体育行为正当化的根据是具有极大包容性和解释力的社会相当性理论;在正当的对抗性体育比赛中,在比赛时间、比赛场地,参赛运动员以比赛为目的并遵守比赛规则的竞技行为具有社会相当性;正当的竞技体育行为和体育暴力界分的理论依据是社会相当性理论,界分的实践标准是行为人客观上是否遵守了比赛规则以及行为人主观上是否具有罪过。
Competitive sports behavior in the system of legitimacy should be positioned as legitimate business and victim commitment of the two legitimate reasons for the competition; the basis for the justification of competitive sports behavior is extremely inclusive and explanatory power of social equivalence theory; in In fair and confrontational sports competitions, the social behavior of athletes who compete for the purpose of the match and abide by the rules of the game at the competition time, the competition venue and the competition venue has social equivalence; the theoretical basis of the proper competitive sport behavior and sports violence subdivision is the social equivalence The criterion of practice is whether the actor objectively observes the competition rules and whether the perpetrator has the sin or not.