论文部分内容阅读
在以往的景观设计中,锐角被大多数设计师认为是需要慎重考虑的一个景观元素,特别是30°以下的角度,更是极少出现在方案设计中,于二维角度看更是几乎找不到它们的存在。但受限于场地客观条件以及景观形式的多样性,如场地固有形态存在锐角、两圆相切必定出现锐角,两条园路斜向相交产生锐角等等情况。对于此,大多数景观设计师总是潜意识的会用其他诸如倒圆角,切断等手法使之消失在设计方案中。本文从锐角元素的特征入手,对景观设计中锐角元素的应用利弊进行分析,认为锐角元素在某些场景中会有有别于传统的、常规化景观设计元素的效果。
In the past, landscape design, acute angle is considered by most designers as a landscape element that needs careful consideration, especially under the angle of 30 °, which is seldom seen in the design of the program and is almost found in the two-dimensional perspective Not their existence. However, due to the objective conditions of the site and the diversity of landscape forms, such as the presence of an acute angle in the site, the acute angles of the two circles must be acute, the acute angles of the two roads obliquely intersect, and so on. For this reason, most landscape architects always unconsciously use other techniques such as rounding and cutting to make them disappear into the design scheme. This paper starts from the characteristics of acute angle elements and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the application of acute angle elements in landscape design. It is concluded that the acute angle elements will be different from the traditional and conventional landscape design elements in some scenes.