在学报的编辑工作中,发现所遵循的两个主要规范——《中国学术期刊(光盘版)检索与评价数据规范》与《中国高等学校自然科学学报编排规范》(修订版)——存在不少差异甚至是矛盾的地方。通过对两规范的比较分析,希望找出各规范的更合理处,使执行规范者能根据不同要求分别对待,并希望有关部门制定或修改规范时,注意规范之间的统一性。 In the editorial work of the journal, it is found that the two main norms to be followed - “China Academic Journal (CD) Edition Data Retrieval and Evaluation Standard” and “Chinese Higher School Natural Science Journals Edition” (Revised Edition) - exist Less difference or even contradictory place. Through the comparative analysis of the two norms, I hope to find out the more reasonable place of the norms so that the executive standardists can treat them according to different requirements and hope that the relevant departments should pay attention to the uniformity of norms when formulating or revising the norms.