一、问题的提出 有篇论文稿,题目叫《谈审美情感与审美想象的培养》(以下简称《培养》)。该文出自一位青年教师之手。一般按审稿规定,编辑应先对来稿进行初审筛选。倘编辑可以做出评判的稿子,编辑就写初审意见;若编辑遇到自己不熟悉的专业方面的论文,则由专家去审。但《培养》一文没经编辑过目,就请一位学中文的副教授审阅。不久,这位副教授写出如下一份审稿意见: First, the question raised There is a lengthy manuscript, the title is “about aesthetic feelings and aesthetic imagination training” (hereinafter referred to as “training”). The text comes from the hands of a young teacher. According to the provisions of the reviewers, editors should first review the manuscript selection. If the editor can make the manuscript of the judgment, the editor writes the opinion of the first instance; if the editor encounters the dissertation that he is unfamiliar with professionally, he shall be examined by the expert. However, “Culture” has not edited an article, please read a Chinese associate professor review. Soon, the associate professor wrote the following manuscript review comments: