论文部分内容阅读
本刊先后收到四川省公路局吉中仁同志的讨论稿及同济大学范立础同志的答复稿,因篇幅所限,不能全文发表,编辑部作了删简。如有问题,还可以提出讨论。吉中仁(四川省公路局): (1)第一个问题原文(11)式中δ_(ik)~φ说明为由赘余力x_(ki)=1在赘余力x_(it)方向上引起的徐变变形,但因δ_(ik)~φ表达式右端各项与相应弹性体系中的δ_(ik)表达式各项均相差一个乘数1/γ(t,τ_0),按原文γ(t,τ_0)的定义,δ_(ik)~φ应为由x_(kt)=1在x_(it)方向上引起的弹徐变形之总和。原文(12)式中δ_(ik)~φ说明为由恒载(或予应力)及初始力在结构赘余力方向i上引起的徐变变形,这一叙述是对的,但关键在于它应不应当包含原文式(2)中的φ_d或0.4k_v的徐变滞
The journal has received the discussion draft of Comrade Ji Zhongren from the Sichuan Provincial Highway Bureau and the replies of Comrade Fan Liji of Tongji University. Due to space limitations, the full text cannot be published. The editorial department made a deduction. If there is a problem, you can also discuss it. Ji Zhongren (Sichuan Highway Bureau): (1) The first question in the original text (11) is that δ _ (ik) φ φ is described as being caused by 赘 赘 力 x ( (ki ) = 1 in the direction of 赘 力 _ x ( (it). The creep deformation, but because the δ _ (ik) ~ φ expression and the corresponding elastic system in the δ _ (ik) expression are different by a multiplier 1 / γ (t, τ 0), according to the original γ ( The definition of t, τ_0), δ _ (ik) ~ φ should be the sum of the slack-deformation caused by x _ (kt) = 1 in the x_(it) direction. In the formula (12), δ_(ik)~φ is described as the creep deformation caused by the dead load (or pre-stress) and the initial force in the direction of the structure remnant force i. This narrative is correct, but the key is that it should be Should not include the φ_d or 0.4k_v delay lag in the original expression (2)