论文部分内容阅读
一、茅盾文学奖与网络文学世界上的评奖可能没有不存在争议的。当然争议有大小之分,有的争议是有价值的有的争议是无价值的甚至是负价值的。然而,像茅盾文学奖这样的争论之大、乱象之奇,恐怕世界少见。这里既有因为作品价值的多样性而导致的误读,也有规则制定不合理带来的不公平,还有评奖过程不够透明所引发的暗箱操作猜想,更有因为行政、商业介入导致的质疑,甚至有因为读者虚位造成的自娱自乐。从最早对《李自成》(姚雪垠)的质疑、到1990年代对《茶人三部曲》(王旭烽)、
First, Mao Dun Literature Award and online literature may not be the world’s awards are not controversial. Of course, there are controversies of different sizes, and some controversies are valuable. Some disputes are worthless or even negative. However, such controversy as the Mao Dun Literature Award such a large, chaotic odd, I am afraid the world is rare. There are both misunderstandings caused by the diversity of the value of the works, the unfairness caused by unreasonable rules, and the obscurantism speculation caused by the lack of transparency in the process of awarding. This is because of questions raised by administrative and commercial interventions, There are even entertaining because of the reader’s imaginary position. From the first questioning of “Li Zi Cheng” (Yao Xueyin) to the “Trilogy of the Tea People” (Wang Xu Feng) in the 1990s,