引用=引证吗?

来源 :中学语文教学 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:www123123123123
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
时下,好些语文辅助读物和颇具权威性的教学参考资料在分析(别了,司徒雷登)(高中语文三册,以下简称(别)文)的论证方法时,认为(别)文多处大量地引用艾奇逊的言论是使用了引证法。言下之意便是:凡是引用了他人的言论就是引证。笔者认为,这个观点值得商榷。何谓“引? Nowadays, when several language-assisted reading materials and authoritative teaching reference materials are used in the analysis (not to mention, Stuart) (three volumes of high school language, hereinafter referred to as the (other) paper), it is considered that there are many references Acheson’s remarks use citations. The implication of this is that quotes from others are cited. The author believes that this view is debatable. What is "leading?
其他文献