论文部分内容阅读
【典子的话】关于网络语言的争论一直都没有停止过,有专家学者观点,也有普通民众声音,见仁见智,此伏彼起。网络语言在争论中流行着,新鲜词汇层出不穷,有的诙谐风趣、入木三分,也有的莫名其妙让人不明就里。赞成也好,反对也罢,不论如何,网络语言已与我们的生活密不可分。此时最关键的就是让我们都拥有一双慧眼,让那些有价值的沉淀下来丰富祖国的语言宝库,让那些无意义的随风而逝。此次正方论证扎实,论据也颇为有力,优势明显。相比较而言反方虽看似底气十足,但因为自己的观点缺乏事实支撑,显得有些立足不稳。好了,本期最佳辩手授予正方的杨杉同学,他的论述由浅入深、逻辑严密,举例形象贴切,表达干净利索,字里行间透露着宽容和理性。他将获得由接力出版社提供的陈丹燕的《梯形教室的六个下午》一书!
[The words of the canon] The debate on cyber language has never stopped. There are opinions from experts and scholars as well as the voices of ordinary people. Internet languages are popular in the debate. Fresh words appear endlessly, some are witty, three-in-three, and some are unknown to people. Whether it is in favor of or against it, the Internet language has become inseparable from our lives. The most crucial thing at this time is to let us all have a pair of eye-catching eyes, let those valuable sediments enrich the treasure house of the motherland’s language, let those meaningless winds pass away. This time, the positive argument was solid and the arguments were quite powerful and obvious. In contrast, although the anti- side seems to be full of confidence, but because of their lack of factual support, it appears to be somewhat unstable. Well, this year’s best debater granted Yang Fang of Zheng Fang. His arguments are shallow and deep, logical, with appropriate examples and vivid expressions. The line reveals tolerance and reason. He will receive a book entitled “Six Afternoon of Ladder Classrooms” by Chen Danyan provided by Relay Press!