论文部分内容阅读
目的分析哮喘患者在接受雾化治疗时给予全程护理干预模式对患者生命体征以及临床症状的影响。方法 68例哮喘患者为研究对象,随机分为研究组与对照组,每组34例。所有患者均接受雾化治疗,对照组患者给予常规性护理干预,研究组患者给予全程护理干预。比较两组的护理效果。结果护理前,两组血氧饱和度、心率、呼吸频率、日间临床症状及夜间临床症状评分比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);护理后,研究组血氧饱和度、心率、呼吸频率、日间临床症状及夜间临床症状评分均优于对照组,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组患者的护理满意度为97.06%,高于对照组的76.47%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论哮喘患者在接受雾化治疗时,给予其全程护理干预,能够有效的改善患者在接受治疗过程中的生命体征以及临床症状,且在全程护理干预模式下,哮喘患者对护理人员的护理工作满意程度也有所上升,具有一定临床意义,值得推广使用。
Objective To analyze the effect of full nursing intervention on vital signs and clinical symptoms of asthmatic patients receiving nebulization. Methods Sixty-eight asthma patients were randomly divided into study group and control group, 34 cases in each group. All patients received nebulization treatment, patients in control group received routine nursing intervention, and patients in study group were given full-time nursing intervention. Compare the two groups of nursing effects. Results Before nursing, there was no significant difference in the scores of oxygen saturation, heart rate, respiratory rate, clinical symptoms in daytime and nighttime clinical symptoms between the two groups (P> 0.05). After nursing, the oxygen saturation, heart rate, Respiratory rate, clinical symptoms during the day and clinical symptoms at night were better than the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P <0.05). The nursing satisfaction of the study group was 97.06%, which was higher than that of the control group (76.47%), the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Asthmatic patients received full-time nursing intervention when receiving nebulization therapy, which can effectively improve the vital signs and clinical symptoms of patients during the course of treatment. In the whole nursing intervention mode, patients with asthma are satisfied with the nursing staff’s nursing work The degree has also risen, has certain clinical significance, it is worth to promote use.