论文部分内容阅读
金代学术承辽绍唐,其春秋学呈现出新旧两种不同的风貌。在朝派崇《左》尊杜,属于汉唐学术系统。作为学术主流,金代对过度成熟的汉唐古注疏的倒退性接受,大大阻碍了金代春秋学的发展;以王若虚、李世弼为代表的在野派则是源于对中唐啖、赵、陆春秋学派的汲取和对北宋春秋学的继承,代表了春秋学发展的新方向。通过民间书籍的流通零星北传的南宋学术,则对金代春秋学影响甚微。金亡之后,批判《左传》及杜注的在野派春秋学迅速被南方春秋学同化,而以《左传》为主的主流春秋学派则在南方学术冲击之下,在北方延续了半个多世纪,直到延祐科举复行,才最终退出历史舞台。
Jin Dynasty academic Cheng Liao Shao Tang, its spring and autumn presents two different styles of old and new. Adhering to the “Left” respect and admiration toward the school of worship, belongs to the academic system of Han and Tang Dynasties. As the academic mainstream, the backward acceptance of the over-mature Han and Tang dynasties by the Jin dynasty greatly hindered the development of the Chun-Qiu studies in the Jin dynasty. The wilderness factions represented by Wang Ru-xu and Li Shi-bi originated from the rebellions of Zhong and Tang dynasties, Zhao and Lu The study of the Spring School and its succession to the Spring and Autumn of the Northern Song Dynasty represented the new direction of the development of the Spring School. Through the circulation of folk books Sporadic North Song academic, the Jin Dynasty Chunqiu little effect. After the death of Jin Dynasty, the criticism of Zuo Zhuan and Du Yuan’s out-going school of spring and autumn was rapidly assimilated by Southern Spring and Autumn Studies while the mainstream Spring-Autumn school dominated mainly by Zuo Zhuan continued in the north for half For centuries, it was not until the extension of the Yokoyoku imperial examination that it eventually quit the stage of history.