论文部分内容阅读
要说到该种作伪招术的肇始,那一定不是最近几年的事。收藏圈子里人常常会议论到诸如以往张大千作伪石涛石溪、刘伯年仿华新罗以及江寒汀假造虚谷作品之事(据史料记载米芾、郑板桥、任伯年等等也做过此等事,可想而知肯定还有许多未被识破的同等事例),我以为都属于书画历史上“仿制”造假嫌疑的“成功”(指蒙骗了许多行家)先例,只是现时期“仿制”作伪行为似乎更为“普遍”、欺诈性色彩(历史上的一些书画作伪行为并非都是为了牟利)更浓重,尤其是当今一些名家嫡传弟子或亲属介入此造假行动后,着实已让许多鉴藏人士甚至行家吃尽了苦头。
It must not have been the case in recent years when it comes to the beginning of this trickery. In the circle of collectors, people usually talk about things like Zhang Daqian’s fake stone Tao Shih, Liu Bianian’s imitation Huaxin Luo and Jiang Hanting’s fake Konggu works (according to the historical records Mi Mi, Zheng Banqiao, Ren Bian years, etc.) I would like to know there are certainly many unidentified examples), I think all belong to the history of painting “imitation ” fraud suspect “success ” (refers to deceived many experts) precedent, but the current period Fraudulent colors (historically, not all paintings and paintings are for profit) are even more concentrated, especially when some famous disciples or relatives nowadays engage in this fraud operation, Many Taiwanese collectors and even experts suffered a lot.