论文部分内容阅读
《庄子·天下》对于诸子的学术批评历来为学界所关注。论文尝试以“天下”、“内圣外王”、“道术”作为理解《庄子·天下》的核心关键词,通过对这三个核心关键词的考察,认为《天下》中提出的“天下”是诸子立论的学术对象,“内圣外王”是诸子努力实践自身学术的途径,“道术”是衡量诸子学术价值的标准。指出《天下》中对惠施的批评内容绝非误入,进而对该篇整体的学术批评的论述风格加以评析。
“Zhuangzi world” academic criticism for the philosophers has always been the concern of academics. The essay attempts to use the key words of “world”, “inner saint and outer king” and “Taoism” as the key words to understand Zhuangzi world. Through the investigation of these three key words, “” The world “is the academic object of the philosophers’ argument. ” Necromancer “is the means by which the sons and daughters try their own academic practice. ” Taoism “is the standard to measure the academic value of the sages. It points out that the criticism of Huishi in ”The World" is by no means inaccurate, and then comments on the style of the overall academic criticism.