论文部分内容阅读
体育仲裁,实为仲裁纠纷解决方式引入体育界之表征。仲裁的民间性决定了其必须接受司法监督,体育仲裁亦不能外。仲裁的本质、性质及价值都为体育仲裁仅接受法院的程序性监督提供了强大的理论支持。法院在体育仲裁司法监督的实践中,也一直恪守谨慎介入的原则。这一方面是因为体育仲裁在程序上的公正性得到较多保证,另一方面也显示了司法通过支持体育仲裁而确保体育行业自治的价值追求。司法介入与行业自治在此相得益彰。从这个意义上讲,体育仲裁的司法监督对于国际商事仲裁司法监督有颇多值得借鉴之处。
Sports arbitration, in fact, is the way to solve disputes in arbitration. The non-governmental nature of arbitration determines that it must be subject to judicial supervision and that sports arbitration can not be excluded. The essence, nature and value of arbitration all provide strong theoretical support for the sports arbitration to accept only the procedural supervision of the court. In the practice of judiciary supervision of sports arbitration, the court has also abided by the principle of careful intervention. This is partly because the procedural fairness of sports arbitration is more guaranteed, and on the other hand, it shows the value pursuit of judicial autonomy through the support of sports arbitration. Judicial intervention and industrial autonomy in this complement each other. In this sense, the judicial supervision of sports arbitration is quite worthy of reference for the judicial supervision of international commercial arbitration.