论文部分内容阅读
毫无疑问,多数地震工作者都认为三分量勘探所能取得的有用信息远远超过常规的垂直分量地面地震勘探。但额外费用的增加是否必要,其意见往往是不一致的。尽管我们发现分解S波比劈木头甚至原子裂变更令人神往,但这个问题却是不容回避的。看来在1988年做到这一点时机尚未成熟,特别是本文的有限篇幅也不足以解决问题。但不论怎样,为了回答这个问题。我们希望至少能把某些要素拼凑在一起,其答案还待将来。
There is no doubt that most earthquake workers agree that the useful information obtained by a three-component exploration far exceeds the conventional vertical-component surface seismic exploration. However, whether the additional cost is necessary or not is often inconsistent. Although we find it more fascinating to decompose the S-wave than wood splitting or even atomic fission, the problem is unavoidable. It seems that the timing is not yet ripe for this in 1988, and especially the limited length of this article is not enough to solve the problem. But no matter what, in order to answer this question. We hope at least some of the elements can be pieced together, the answer for the future.