清代汉学引人注目,相关研究成果不断涌现。但这些成果在论述和评价汉学时,往往以章太炎、梁启超于清末民初所作清代学术史著作为基点,而对晚清时期宗宋学者的论述不甚在意。实际上,由于汉学乃相对于宋学而言,宗宋学者对汉学的评论虽有门户成见,但因处于相同或相近的历史环境,面对共同的社会历史问题,因此在问题意识、思维方式以及治学理念、原则、方法等方面的看法,自有现代学者不同甚至不及之处。 Qing dynasty sinology attracts attention, related research results are emerging. However, when discussing and evaluating Sinology, these achievements tend to take Zhang Taiyan and Liang Qichao as the starting point for the academic history of the Qing Dynasty in the late Qing Dynasty and the early Republican period, but are not very concerned about the arguments of the Song and Song scholars in the late Qing Dynasty. In fact, since the study of sinology is relative to that of Song studies, the scholars of Song and Song dynasties have prejudiced about the theory of sinology. However, facing the common social and historical problems in the same or similar historical environment, As well as the concept of scholarship, principles, methods and other aspects of the views of modern scholars have their own differences or even less.